Mobile phone costs will go up in India.
With the Budget 2017-18 bringing in a Special Additional Duty (SAD) of two per cent on PCBs or Printed Circuit Boards used in the manufacture of mobile phones, the prices of cellphones are likely to increase.
In a bid to push local
manufacturing in the country, the government in its budget for the 2017-18
fiscal year has proposed a two percent special additional duty on import of
PCBs, the key components of the mobile phones.
The government is aiming at
companies locally manufacturing the PCBs and provide “adequate protection to
domestic industry.” Though the move is likely to result in a marginal increase
in the price of handsets, as these components are mostly imported. It is worth
noting that PCBs alone contribute to 25-30 percent of the cost of the
smartphones.
At this moment, it is not
certain how the levied duty on PCBs will affect prices of mobile phones in the
country. Notably, there has been some back and forth on the Special Additional
Duty applicable on the populated printed circuit boards. While the
budget had introduced the same 2 percent SAD, raising it from 0 percent,
the government rolled back this import duty on May 5 last year - much to the
chagrin of Make in India advocates who felt the move encouraged the philosophy
of 'Assemble in India' instead.
In last year’s budget the
government levied a 2% special duty on populated printed circuit boards used in
mobile phones, laptops and personal computers.
The proposal triggered outrage
in the industry, which said the ecosystem for local manufacturing of these
components was not ready in India. Consequently, the duty was rolled back in
May 2016. Ironically, the move will
only affect those manufacturers that 'Make in India', and those that import
their handsets in entirety are unlikely to be affected. It's possible that this
cost burden will not be passed onto the consumer in the form of a price hike,
and that manufacturers absorb the increased costs themselves. It may also be
that 'unpopulated' PCBs are imported instead, as a loophole to the new
regulation.
Comments
Post a Comment